Numerous seminars offer a writer reaction duration: the writers are shown the reviews and tend to be offered space that is limitedsay, 500 words) to react to the reviews, such as for instance by clarifying misunderstandings or responding to questions. The writer reaction might be known as a “rebuttal”, but I don't like this term given that it sets a tone that is adversarial.
Your paper will simply be accepted when there is a champ for the paper: a person who is worked up about it and can make an effort to persuade the remainder committee to just accept the paper. Your response has to offer ammo to your champ to conquer objections. Then the main goal of your response is to create that champion when there isn't a champ.
See the reviews and decide what tips you will answer. You will need to concentrate on the most critical and substantive people.
In your responses, acknowledge your errors forthrightly. Do not ignore or avoid issues that are key specially people that multiple reviewers raised.
Your reaction to each true point would be one paragraph in your reaction. Start the paragraph by having a brief heading or name in regards to the point. Usually do not assume that the reviewers keep in mind exactly what ended up being authored by every reviewer, nor which they will re-read their reviews before reading your response.