Findings and rhetorical or questions that are hypothetical. The Panel has endeavored to close out all this product to the contentions noted below. Although this is of requisite an overview, the Panel records that most regarding the Respondent’s submissions were considered within their entirety relating to the current choice.
The Respondent requests that the Complaint be rejected. The Respondent asserts it notes is a valid and common word in English that relates and is essential to dating, with that of a hypothetical domain name which removes one letter from a well-known brand thus leaving a meaningless typographical variant that it is not engaged in typo-squatting and contrasts the position of the disputed domain name, which. The Respondent submits that the previous is a good faith enrollment whilst the latter may very well be in bad faith.
The Respondent notes that the disputed domain name shouldn't be viewed as a typographical variation associated with the Complainant’s mark due to the fact replaced letters
“e” and “i” are on contrary sides associated with keyboard in a way that the tips are pressed with various fingers.